Skip to main content
    Policy

    Evidence update log

    A live log of the most recently reviewed and enriched evidence pages on Peptide Authority — peptide profiles and condition guides, sorted by review date.

    Last reviewed:

    Peptide Authority continuously enriches its evidence content. This page surfaces (a) the peptide profiles that have a full Evidence Standards Panel (12 structured fields including human-evidence grade, claim-vs-evidence, safety uncertainty, research gaps, safer alternatives) seeded, and (b) the symptom guides that have the full standard-care / when-to-see-GP / approved-treatments / evidence-table top panel populated. Sorted by review date, most-recent first.

    Peptide profile coverage

    71 / 71 fully seeded

    Profiles without seeded data render the honest fallback panel and are enriched in priority order.

    Symptom guide coverage

    45 / 60 fully seeded

    Guides without the standard-care template render the legacy template; the new panel is added in traffic-order.

    Most-recently reviewed peptide profiles

    Top 30, by “last reviewed” date. The presence of an entry here means the profile has been substantively reviewed and graded against our evidence-grading methodology.

    Most-recently reviewed symptom guides

    Top 20, by “last reviewed” date. These guides lead with standard UK care, NHS pathways, and an honest evidence table before any peptide-research discussion.

    What “reviewed” means here

    A peptide profile is “reviewed” in this log if it has:

    • A graded UK regulatory status pill (licensed / POM / unlicensed / research-only).
    • A graded evidence grade against our A–E system.
    • Human and preclinical evidence grades populated.
    • An explicit list of approved and unapproved-but-marketed claims.
    • A claim-vs-evidence matrix for the most-marketed assertions.
    • Safety uncertainty and drug-interaction uncertainty scores.
    • A “what this page cannot tell you” honest-limits section.
    • Research gaps and safer-alternatives sections.

    A guide is “reviewed” if it has the standard-care, GP-trigger, UK-approved-treatments, and honest evidence-table fields populated.