Skip to main content
    Fact-checked by the Peptide Authority Editorial Board · Last reviewed:
    Claim review

    AOD-9604 fat-loss claims — claim review

    AOD-9604 is the modified C-terminal fragment of HGH originally developed by Metabolic Pharmaceuticals for obesity. It failed Phase 3 trials but persists as a popular cosmetic-clinic and online-supplement weight-loss product. This page covers what the evidence actually shows.

    What people claim

    • “Targeted fat loss without growth hormone side effects”
    • “FDA GRAS-approved fat loss” (misrepresents the GRAS food-ingredient status)
    • “Stack with semaglutide for accelerated fat loss”

    Evidence honestly

    Phase 3 obesity development of AOD-9604 did not produce a licensed product. Meaningful body-composition benefit was not demonstrated at trial scale. Off-label cosmetic-clinic use has no published RCT to support the marketed effects.

    Safer alternatives

    • Licensed Wegovy (semaglutide) or Mounjaro (tirzepatide) via NHS or registered private prescriber.
    • NHS Tier 2 / 3 weight-management programmes.
    • Structured diet, resistance training, and cardio — the evidence-based body-recomposition stack.

    Frequently asked questions

    Did AOD-9604 ever become a licensed weight-loss drug?
    No. AOD-9604 failed Phase 3 obesity trials and did not progress to a licensed obesity product anywhere in the world.
    Is AOD-9604 'safe' because it has GRAS status?
    AOD-9604 has US FDA GRAS (Generally Recognised As Safe) status as a food ingredient — that is not the same as a medicine licence. GRAS status does not authorise injectable medical use or weight-loss claims.
    Does it produce meaningful fat loss in cosmetic clinics?
    Clinic-marketing claims outrun the trial evidence. Failed Phase 3 obesity development is the most relevant signal — meaningful clinical fat-loss benefit was not demonstrated at scale.
    Is it WADA-prohibited?
    AOD-9604 is treated as a growth-hormone-fragment compound; WADA position is class-prohibited. Athlete strict liability applies.
    Why is it still marketed?
    GRAS status and 'lipolytic HGH fragment' positioning create a memorable story for clinic and online marketing. The underlying efficacy evidence does not support weight-loss claims.

    Last reviewed:

    Next review due:

    Spotted an error or something out of date? Send a correction.

    Related