Skip to main content
    Fact-checked by the Peptide Authority Editorial Board · Last reviewed:
    UK Legal Reference

    Tesamorelin UK legal status

    Tesamorelin (Egrifta) is an FDA-approved medicine for one narrow indication: visceral-fat reduction in HIV-associated lipodystrophy. It has no UK or EU marketing authorisation. ‘Research-grade tesamorelin’ marketed for general body composition is unlicensed-medicine supply with no UK clinical-need basis.

    UK: Unlicensed (UK)WADA: Prohibited in sportCLimited human evidence

    Current UK regulatory framing

    Tesamorelin is a synthetic GHRH analogue. It has FDA approval (as Egrifta / Egrifta SV) for reducing excess abdominal fat in HIV patients with lipodystrophy. It does not have a UK or EU marketing authorisation for any indication.

    The FDA indication is narrow and clinically specific. The consumer-market positioning of tesamorelin as a “visceral-fat-reduction peptide” for the general population extrapolates well beyond it.

    The ‘specials’ question

    UK law allows a prescriber to source an unlicensed medicine via the “specials” framework where a UK-licensed product isn’t suitable. For tesamorelin, this might in principle apply to an HIV patient stabilised on the FDA-approved product abroad and continuing treatment in the UK. It does not extend to a fitness-population prescription for “belly fat” or body recomposition.

    See compounded peptides in the UK for the framework details.

    Sport — WADA S2

    As a GHRH analogue, tesamorelin falls under S2 of the WADA Prohibited List. Strict liability applies. The FDA-approved status does not produce a TUE pathway for general use.

    What this means in practice

    For sellers

    Marketing tesamorelin for visceral-fat reduction in the general population is unlicensed-medicine advertising that extrapolates from a narrow specialist indication. MHRA and ASA jurisdiction.

    For clinics

    A UK clinic offering tesamorelin to a non-HIV patient for aesthetic body-composition reasons is outside any plausible ‘specials’ justification. The CQC-registered clinic question becomes acute: which clinical guideline supports this?

    For athletes

    Direct S2 exposure. The FDA-approved status of tesamorelin makes no difference to WADA classification.

    Red-flag claims

    If you see wording like this on a seller, clinic, or social-media advert, treat it as a warning sign rather than a benefit.

    • “Tesamorelin — FDA-approved visceral fat reduction”

      True only for the narrow HIV-lipodystrophy indication. Implying general-population approval misrepresents the licence.

    • “Egrifta — get the same active ingredient at half the price”

      Egrifta is not UK-licensed. ‘Same active ingredient’ from a research-chemical supplier is not the same as the FDA-approved product through a regulated supply chain.

    • “GHRH therapy for over-40s body composition”

      Off-label / off-licence use of a non-UK-licensed medicine for a non-clinical indication. Hard to fit inside any lawful prescribing route.

    • “Compounded tesamorelin — UK pharmacy”

      ‘Specials’ framework is narrow. Body-composition use does not meet the clinical-need test required to compound an unlicensed medicine.

    Sources & further reading

    Frequently asked questions

    Is tesamorelin licensed in the UK?
    No. Tesamorelin (brand name Egrifta) is licensed in the US by the FDA for HIV-associated lipodystrophy. It is not licensed by the MHRA or EMA. There is no UK marketing authorisation.
    Can a UK clinician prescribe tesamorelin?
    There is no UK-licensed tesamorelin product to prescribe. The UK ‘specials’ framework could in principle support importation under narrow clinical-need circumstances (e.g. a specific HIV-related indication where a patient has been stabilised on it abroad), but it doesn't extend to general body-composition use.
    Is tesamorelin prohibited in sport?
    Yes. As a GHRH analogue, tesamorelin falls under S2 of the WADA Prohibited List. Strict liability.
    What's the difference between tesamorelin and CJC-1295?
    Both are GHRH analogues. Tesamorelin actually completed pharmaceutical development and is FDA-approved for a narrow indication; CJC-1295 was never approved. From a UK regulatory perspective the difference is meaningful in principle but small in practice — neither has a UK MA.
    Why is tesamorelin marketed as ‘visceral fat reduction’?
    Its FDA indication is reducing excess abdominal fat in HIV-associated lipodystrophy. Marketing then extrapolates this to general-population body composition, which is well beyond the licensed indication and not supported by trial evidence in non-HIV populations.

    Last reviewed:

    Next review due:

    Spotted an error or something out of date? Send a correction.

    Related